Research Article |
Between Fear and Hope: The Privatization of Government Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia and the Role of Leadership in Managing Change
Author(s) : Areej Shafai1*
Publisher: FOREX Publication
Published: 30 December 2022
e-ISSN: 2347-4696
Page(s): 94-100
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of privatization as it applies to public universities and colleges in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It also aims to critically reflect on the expected concerns due to the new environmental change resulting from the implementation of privatization and its impact on performance. There is a scarcity of existing literature on how privatization affects employee performance, and whether or not employees remain competent in their new environment. This paper also focuses on the significant role of leadership as organizations transition from public organizations to privatized ones. An in-depth content analysis of the privatization of public Saudi higher education institutions was adapted as a methodological approach to this study. Through this approach, the gap that exists between the new transformations, the leadership required, and the necessary preparations for privatization were analyzed. The major findings indicate that the idea of privatization in and of itself constitutes a great fear and anxiety for employees due to the organizational, administrative, and cultural change that privatization may bring. Higher education institutions are in dire need of influential and visionary leaders who can manage and facilitate the privatization process to ensure its success and achievement of the desired goals. The paper explores the nature, potential consequences, and concerns of privatization. It highlights the importance of leadership as a fundamental pillar of change.
Keywords: Privatization
, Leadership
, Change Management
, Higher Education in Saudi Arabia
, Transformation
.
Areej Shafai*, Assistant Professor College of Business Administration, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia; Email: ashafai13@gmail.com
[1] Shaheen, S.B.; (2010). Privatization as a process of domination in Turkey. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 18(4), 483-498.
[2] Kikeri, S., & Nellis, J. (2004). An assessment of privatization. The World Bank Research Observer, 19(1), 87-118.
[3] Privatization system (2021). Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers). Retrieved from https://laws.boe.gov.sa/BoeLaws/Laws/LawDetails/8af67ec1-6776-4f67-abb4-ad0900eadf2f/1
[4] Dahlan. Abdullah, 2016. Privatization in education needs to be reconsidered. Retrieved from https://www.okaz.com.sa/articles/na/1505544
[5] Coomans & Hallo de Wolf, ‘Privatisation of Education and the Right to Education’ in de Feyter & Gomez (eds.), Privatisation and Human Rights in the Age of Globalisation, 2005.
[6] Rizvi, F. (2016). Privatization in education: Trends and consequences.
[7] Tilak, J. B. (2008). Higher education: a public good or a commodity for trade? Prospects, 38(4), 449-466. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9093-2
[8] Cooper, B. S., & Randall, E. V. (2008). Fear and privatization. Educational policy, 22(1), 204-227
[9] Lubienski, C. (2016). Sector distinctions and the privatization of public education policymaking. Theory and Research in Education, 14(2), 192-212.
[10] Cunha, R. C., & Cooper, C. L. (2002). Does privatization affect corporate culture and employee wellbeing? Journal of Managerial Psychology.
[11] Ali. A. Al-Zahrani. (2019). The obstacles of privatization of Saudi University in light of Vision 2039 from academic leaders' perspectives. REMAH Journal, 35, 287–340.
[12] Holzhacker, D., Chornoivan, O., Yazilitas, D., & Dayan-Ochir, K. (2009). Privatization in higher education: Cross-country analysis of trends, policies, problems, and solutions. Institute for Higher Education Policy.
[13] Al-Jobory, F. H., & Dhidan, H. F. (2021). Factors of privatization success and constraints. Journal of College of Law for Legal and Political Sciences, 37(1), 495-517.
[14] Kwon, M., & Cho, Y. C. (2017). Investigating effects of entrepreneurial orientation and management on performance: public vs. private sector. Journal of Marketing Thought, 4(2), 12-25.
[15] Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological management of individual performance, 23(1), 3-25.
[16] Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
[17] Bozeman, B., & Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public administration review, 109-118.
[18] Emmert, M. A., & Crow, M. M. (1988). Public, private and hybrid organizations: An empirical examination of the role of publicness. Administration & Society, 20(2), 216-244.
[19] Jacobsen, D. I. (2021). Motivational Differences? Comparing Private, Public and Hybrid Organizations. Public Organization Review, 1-15.
[20] Kipo-Sunyehzi, D. D. (2020). Public-Private Organizations Behaviour: the Paradoxes in the Implementation of Ghana’s Health Insurance Scheme. Public Organization Review, 20(3), 585-596.
[21] Ramamonjiarivelo, Z., Hearld, L., & Weech-Maldonado, R. (2021). The impact of public hospitals’ privatization on nurse staffing. Health Care Management Review, 46(4), 266-277.
[22] Wu, H. (2007). Exploring the sources of privatization & hyphen; induced performance changes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(1), 44–59. Retrieved from https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1108/09534810710715270
[23] Lee, M. (1998). Corporatization and privatization of Malaysian higher education. International Higher Education, (10).
[24] Valkama, P. (2013). Corporatization as organizational innovation. In Organizational Innovation in Public Services (pp. 72-91). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
[25] Igbuzor, O. (2003). Privatization in Nigeria: critical issues of concern to civil society. A Paper Presented at A Power Mapping Roundtable Discussion on the Privatisation Programme in Nigeria organised by Socio-economic rights Initiative (SERI) held at Nigeria Links Hotel Abuja on 3rd September.
[26] Barnett, W. P., & Carroll, G. R. (1995). Modeling internal organizational change. Annual review of sociology, 21(1), 217-236.
[27] Moran, J. W., & Brightman, B. K. (2001). Leading organizational change. Career development international, 6(2), 111-119.
[28] Burnes, B. (2004) Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organisational Dynamics, 4th edn (Harlow:Prentice Hall).
[29] Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard business press.
[30] Mosadeghrad, A. M., & Ansarian, M. (2014). Why do organisational change programmes fail? International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 5(3), 189-218.
[31] Miller, D. (2002) ‘Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that is different?’ Journal of Change Management, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp.359–368.
[32] Mourier, P. and Smith, M.R. (2001) Conquering Organizational Change: How to Succeed where Most Companies Fail, CEP Press, New York.
[33] Spears, L. C. (Ed). (1998). Insights on leadership: Service, stewardship, spirit, and servant-leadership. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons
[34] Shafai, A. A. (2020). Servant-leadership in higher education in Saudi Arabia. Global Servant-Leadership: Wisdom, Love, and Legitimate Power in the Age of Chaos, 253.
[35] Kerber, K., & Buono, A. F. (2005). Rethinking organizational change: Reframing the challenge of change management. Organization Development Journal, 23(3), 23.
[36] Pecujlija, M., Bojanic, R., Cosic, D., Radisic, S., Ivanovic, G., & Delic, Z. (2011). Employees' attitudes toward company privatization as possible predictors of a high-performance work system. African Journal of Business Management, 5(5), 1663.
[37] Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1995). Privatization in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w5113/w5113.pdf
[38] Moran, J.W. and Brightman, B.K. (2000), "Leading organizational change", Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 66-74.
[39] Dr. Christopher Hartig (2021), Leading Change with Faculty in Higher Education Institution Mergers. IJBMR 9(1), 41-44. DOI: 10.37391/IJBMR.090106.https://ijbmr.forexjournal.co.in/archive/volume-9/ijbmr-090106.html
[40] Dr. Tom C. Hogan, Sean Gallagher, Nathan Ousey, Ray Schmitt (2021), The Virtual Transformational Leadership Development Experience: Creating a Classroom of the Future. IJBMR 9(2), 207-210. DOI: 10.37391/IJBMR.090212.https://ijbmr.forexjournal.co.in/archive/volume-9/ijbmr-090212.html
APA 7th Edition
Areej Shafai (2022), Between Fear and Hope: The Privatization of Government Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia and the Role of Leadership in Managing Change. IJBMR 10(4), 94-100. DOI: 10.37391/IJBMR.100402.
APA 6th Edition
Shafai, A. (2022). Between Fear and Hope: The Privatization of Government Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia and the Role of Leadership in Managing Change. International Journal of Business and Management Research, 10(4), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.37391/ijbmr.100402
MLA 8th Edition
Shafai, Areej. “Between Fear and Hope: The Privatization of Government Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia and the Role of Leadership in Managing Change.” International Journal of Business and Management Research, vol. 10, no. 4, FOREX Publication, Dec. 2022, pp. 94–100, doi:10.37391/ijbmr.100402.
Harvard 12th Edition
Shafai, A. (2022) “Between Fear and Hope: The Privatization of Government Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia and the Role of Leadership in Managing Change,” International Journal of Business and Management Research, 10(4), pp. 94–100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37391/ijbmr.100402.
Chicago Edition
Shafai, Areej. “Between Fear and Hope: The Privatization of Government Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia and the Role of Leadership in Managing Change.” International Journal of Business and Management Research 10, no. 4 (December 30, 2022): 94–100. https://doi.org/10.37391/ijbmr.100402.