Research Article |
The Student as the Customer, and the Faculty Dilemma
Author(s) : G. Stan Reeley* and Mary Ann Reeley
Publisher : FOREX Publication
Published : 20 October 2023
e-ISSN :2347-4696
Page(s) : 81-88
Abstract
College and university faculty members today may be facing an identity crisis brought about by an unlikely cause, business economics. In the recent past, say, thirty years ago, college professors were held in the highest regard by peers and students, and recognized for their sagaciousness, wisdom, expertise, and contribution to the community. However, recent data shows that some professors nowadays feel expendable, as second-class citizens, and servants to their patrons, college students or so-called customers. By sheer nature of referring to the student as the customer conjures up the notion that professors work for the students and it is the professor’s job to make sure they are educated, yes, but mostly kept happy and committed to staying enrolled to meet university fiscal demands. Consequently, research shows that faculty members are attempting to reconcile the customer satisfaction of students with the rigor, scholarship, and professionalism expected from them by their university employers. In a new poll, faculty members described how they receive conflicting objectives from well-intended school leaders that simply cannot be done without the risk of losing their teaching position or losing dissatisfied students to the plethora of competing universities marketing themselves to a diminishing number of new student candidates. Therefore, customer satisfaction is apparently a key driver in determining whether faculty members are retained or retired, regardless of their reputation, tenure, or tenacity.
Keywords: Student Customers
, Faculty in Fear
, Universities as Businesses
.
G. Stan Reeley*, Saint Leo University, Eastern Gateway Community College, USA; Email: gonnabeaphd2006@yahoo.com
Mary Ann Reeley, Saint Leo University, Eastern Gateway Community College, USA
[1] Barone, A. (2023). What is total quality management (TQM) and why is it important? Investopedia. Retrieved on June 7, 2023 @ https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/total-quality-management-tqm.asp.
[2] Brink worth, M., McIntyre, J., Jurasaschek, A., Gehlbach, H. (2018). Teacher-student relationships: The Positives and negatives of assessing both perspectives. Chart. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 55, 24.
[3] Budd, R. (2017). Undergraduate orientations towards higher education in Germany and England: problematizing the notion of 'student as customer'. Higher Education, 73(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9977-4).
[4] Carter, S., & Amy Chu-May Yeo. (2016). Students-as-customers’ satisfaction, predictive retention with marketing implications. The International Journal of Educational Management, 30(5), 635-652. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2014-0129).
[5] Chinn, A., (2023). Is the Customer always right? What it means + why it matters. HubSpot. Retrieved in August 10, 2023 @ https://blog.hubspot.com/service/are-customers-always-right#:~:text=Almost%20100%20years%20later%2C%20C%C3%A9sar,the%20customer%20is%20never%20wrong.
[6] Deen, A., (2022). The Teacher shortage has been going on for 50 years. Why are so few entering the profession? The Messenger. Retrieved on October 5, 2022 @ https://www.grid.news/story/politics/2022/10/05/the-teacher-shortage-problem-has-been-going-on-for-50-years-why-are-so-few-entering-the-profession/?utm_source=pocket-newtab.
[7] Drozdowski, M.J. (2023). The college admissions scandal that shook higher education. Best Colleges. Retrieved on August 9, 2023 @ https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/operation-varsity-blues-college-admissions-scandal/
[8] Düddul, P. (2023a, August 30). Read the student survey responses shared by academics and you’ll see why professor Hambling is justified in burning hers. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/read-the-student-survey-responses-shared-by-academics-and-youll-see-why-professor-hambling-is-justified-in-burning-hers-167897.
[9] Eagle, L., & Brennan, R. (2007). Are students customers? TQM and marketing perspectives. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(1), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880710723025).
[10] Guilbault, M. (2016). Students as customers in higher education: reframing the debate. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 26 (2), 1.
[11] Hornstein, H. A. (2017, February). Student Evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016.
[12] Jennings, J.M., and Angelo, T. (2006). Measuring student engagement in learning: promoting shared responsibility for quality outcomes. A call for leadership. Document presented in the student engagement. Measuring and enhancing engagement with learning. Symposium held on Monday and Tuesday 27 and 28 March 2006 at the Frederic Wallis House Conference Centre Lower Hutt, New Zealand).
[13] Kane, R. T., Shaw, M., Pang, S., Salley, W., & Snider, J. B. (2016, summer). Faculty Professional Development and Student Satisfaction in Online Higher Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. https://ojdla.com/archive/summer192/kane_shaw_pang_salley_snider192.pdf.
[14] Marcos, C. M. (2022). New York University professor fired after students say his class was too hard. The Guardian. Retrieved on October 6, 2022 @ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/06/nyu-professor-fired-maitland-jones-jr-student-petition.
[15] Parsell, G. (2000). Medical Education, 34(5), 238–329.
[16] Reeley, G.S. (2016). Online teaching may be perilous to your health. A research and reflection essay on the not-so- well-being of college professors in 21st century classrooms. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness (ISSN# 2155-2843), 10 (2). http://www.na-businesspress.com/JMDC/ReeleyGS_Web10_2_.pdf.
[17] Robinson, K. S. (2022). Alienation in the Neoliberal Academy: A Personal Experience Narrative. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 19(3).
[18] Royo, J. P. (2017). L'estudiant com a client: UN canvi de paradigma en l'educació superior. Students as customers: a paradigm shift in higher education. Debats, 131(2), 41. @ https://doi.org/10.28939/iam.debats.131-2.4.
[19] Saunders, D. (2010). Neoliberal ideology and public higher education in the United States. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 8 (1), 41.
[20] Schwartzman, R. (1995). Are students customers? The metaphoric mismatch between management and education. Education, (116), 423.
[21] Strobel Education Website. (2023). Achieving fairness and transparency in grading practices through standards- based grading. Strobel Education. https://strobeleducation.com/blog/achieving-fairness-and-transparency-in- grading-practices-through-standards-based-grading/
[22] Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2007). Are university students really customers? When illusion may lead to delusion for all! The International Journal of Educational Management, 21(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710716795 )
[23] Tanner, C. A. (1999). Students as customers? Journal of Nursing Education, 34(4), 147. https://doi.org/https://aiuniv.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/students-as-customers/docview/203973804/se-2).
[24] Weimer, M., (2010). What students expect from instructors, other students. Faculty Focus. Retrieved on June 5, 2023 @ https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-and-learning/what-students-expect-from-instructors- other-students/
G. Stan Reeley and Mary Ann Reeley (2023), The Student as the Customer, and the Faculty Dilemma. IJBMR 11(3), 81-88. DOI: 10.37391/IJBMR.110302.