FOREX Press I. J. of Business & Management Research
Support Open Access

Research Article

“CHINDIA” TRADE MOVES A LEVEL UP– ATTEMPT TO SOLVE DEFICIT ISSUES: AN EMPERICAL STUDY IN CHINA

Author(s) : Charan Deep Singh*

Publisher : FOREX Publication

Published : 30 June 2013

e-ISSN :2347-4696

Page(s) : 12-29




Charan Deep Singh*, School of Economic and Commerce,Guangdong University of Technology,Ying Long Road No.161, Tianhe District, Guangzhou city, Guangdong Province, China - 510520; Email: charandeep2007@gmail.com

[1] Matthieu Bussière and Arnaud Mehl 2008 “CHINA'S AND INDIA'S ROLES IN GLOBAL TRADE AND FINANCE: TWIN TITANS FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM?”

[2] Feenstra, Robert, Zhiyuan Li, and Miaojie Yu. 2011. “Exports and Credit Constraints under Incomplete Information: Theory and Evidence from China,” NBER Working Paper No.14960.

[3] Goldberg, Pinelopi K., Amit K. Khandelwal, Nana Pavcnik and Petia Topalova. 2010. Imported Intermediate Inputs and Domestic Product Growth: Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(4), 1727–1767.

[4] Aggarwal, A. (2011), ‘Trade Effects of Anti-dumping in India: Who Benefits?’, International Trade Journal 25(1), pp. 112- 158.

[5] Marelli, E. and Signorelli, M. (2011), ‘China and India: Openness, Trade and Effects on Economic Growth’, European Journal of Comparative Economics 8(1), pp. 129-154.

[6] Tovar, P. (2011), ‘The Use of Temporary Trade Barriers’, in C. P. Bown (ed.), The Great Recession and Import Protection: The Role of Temporary Trade Barriers, London, CEPR and the World Bank.

[7] Vandenbussche, H. and Viegelahn, C. (2011), ‘European Union: No Protectionist Surprises’, in C. P. Bown (ed.), The Great Recession and Import Protection: The Role of Temporary Trade Barriers, London, CEPR and the World Bank.

[8] WTO/UNCTAD (2012), ‘A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis’, Geneva, World Trade Organization and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

[9] Abbott, Phillip, Jeanet Bentzen and Finn Tarp (2008): Vietnam’s Accession to the WTO: Lessons from past Trade Agreements, JEL classification: F13, F14, O24, and O53.

[10] Universal Access to Competitiveness and Trade (U-ACT) (2006): ASEAN China Free Trade Agreement: A Primer, Institutionalization of Multistate holder Consultation for Trade Negotiations (IMUST) project.

[11] Adams, F.G., Gangnes, B. and Shachmurove, Y. (2006). Why is China so Competitive? Measuring and Explaining China’s Competitiveness, The World Economy, 29:2, pp.95-122.

[12] Altenburg, T., Schmitz, H. and Stamm, A. (2008). Break through? China’s and India’s Transition from Production to Innovation, World Development, 36:2, pp.325-344.

[13] Devadason, E. (2008). ‘China and India in World Merchandise Trade: A Comparative Analysis,’ in Facets of a Transforming China: Resource, Trade and Equity, Emile Yeoh Kok- Kheng (ed.), Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya:, pp.110-130.

[14] Devadason, E. (2008). ‘China and India in World Merchandise Trade: A Comparative Analysis,’ in Facets of a Transforming China: Resource, Trade and Equity, Emile Yeoh Kok- Kheng (ed.), Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya:, pp.110-130.

[15] Wu, Y. and Zhou, Z. (2006). Changing Bilateral Trade between China and India, Journal of Asian Economics, 17, pp.509- 518.

[16] Yuan, J-d (2007). The Dragon and the Elephant: ChineseIndian Relations in the 21st Century, The Washington Quarterly, 30:3, pp.131-144.

[17] Zhang, J. (2006). China and India: Why Do They Need to Learn From and Trade with Each Other? Manuscript, China Center for Economic Studies, Fudan University: Shanghai.

[18] Engardio, P. ed. (2007). ‘The Rise of Chindia,’ in Chindia: How China and India are Revolutionizing Global Business, McGraw- Hill: New York, pp.13-34.

Charan Deep Singh (2013), “CHINDIA” TRADE MOVES A LEVEL UP– ATTEMPT TO SOLVE DEFICIT ISSUES: AN EMPERICAL STUDY IN CHINA. IJBMR 1(1), 12-29. DOI: 10.37391/IJBMR.010102.