I. J. of Business & Management Research
Research Article | 
Ethiopia: Ugly Mathematical Unit Cost Fiscal Equalization Formula; Beautiful Findings
Author(s) : Dr. Ludovick Leon Shirima
Publisher : FOREX Publication
Published : 03 March 2021
e-ISSN : 2347-4696
Page(s) : 55-64
Abstract
Purpose: Grant allocation formulas used to allocate fiscal resources among different tiers of government have proved to be useful in many countries around the world. This article provides a unit cost approach equalization formula that was used in the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) to transfer resources from the regions to the woredas (districts) in 2007.
Study methodology: The study approach involved gathering and reviewing of pioneering literature; identifying six representative sectors; field visits to collect and collate data; and data analysis.
Findings: The developed model was highly equalizing. The FDRE adopted the study recommendations and the regional governments used the formula, or a modified version thereof, to transfers resources to woredas.
Research limitations: It was not easy to access the required data. Furthermore, the representative sectors may not holistically reflect the actual budgetary needs of the Local Governments (LGs) due to their heterogeneous tax bases and expenditure needs. This can be addressed with future research to further refine the model presented and granularity of data used.
Practical implications: The study developed and specified a mathematical unit cost equalization model, which was applied to Tigray region in FDRE. The model’s ability to equalize was tested and evaluated econometrically.
Social implications: The paper identified six representative sectors that have high synergies in terms of poverty eradication via improved social service delivery. These sectors attracted large budgetary allocations.
Keywords: Equalization formula, Intergovernmental, Fiscal decentralization, Expenditure needs, Revenue capacity, Ethiopia
Dr. Ludovick Leon Shirima ,Department of Business, Higher Colleges of Technology, Abu Dhabi Men’s College, Abu Dhabi, UAE , Email: lleon@linuxmail.org
[1] Lewis, B.D. (2002) Revenue - Sharing and Grant-Making in Indonesia: The First two Years of Fiscal Decentralization. In: Smoke P (ed.) Intergovernmental Transfers in Asia, forthcoming, Manila: Asia Development Bank.
[2] Shirima, Ludovick L (2020) Rwanda: Lessons from Applied Intergovernmental Fiscal Equalization Formula. International Journal of Business and Management Research (IJBMR), 8 (4), 101-109.
[3] Bird, R.M., and Rodriguez, E. (1999) Decentralization and poverty alleviation. Public Administration and Development, 19, 199–219.
[4] Bird, R.M. (1998) Analysis of Earmarked Taxes. Tax Notes International, pp.2095-2116.
[5] Fujiwara, T. (1992) Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Japan. Draft, Eastern African Department, the World Bank.
[6] Bird, R.M. and Smart, M. (2002) Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: International Lessons for Developing Countries, World Development 30(6), pp. 899-912.
[7] Broadway, R.W. and Hobson P.A.R, (1993) Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Canada. Canadian tax Foundation, Canadian Tax Paper No. 96.
[8] Smart, M. (1998) Taxation and deadweight loss in a system of intergovernmental transfers. Canadian Journal of Economics, 31, 189–206.
[9] Baretti, C., Huber, B., and Lichtblau, K. (2000) A tax on tax revenue. The incentive effects of equalizing transfers: evidence from Germany. Working Paper CESifo, University of Munich.
[10] Musgrave, R. (1993) Who should tax, Where and What? In: McLure, Jr. C (ed.), Tax Assignment in Federal Countries. Canberra: Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, ANU.
[11] Rye, R.C. and Searle B. (1996) The Fiscal Transfer System in Australia. In: ahmad A (ed.) Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer (forthcoming), Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
[12] Bird, R.M. (1986) Federal finance in comparative perspective. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
[13] Shah, A. (1994a) The Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies. Policy and Research Series No.23, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
[14] Shah, A. (1994b) Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Indonesia: Issues and Reform Options, Discussion Paper No.239, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
[15] Brodjonegoro, B. and Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2002) An Analysis of Indonesia’s Transfer System: Recent Performance and Future Prospects. Conference on Can Decentralization Help Rebuild Indonesia? Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, George State University, Atlanta.
[16] Bird, R.M. (2000) Rethinking subnational taxes: a new look at tax assignment. Tax Notes International, 20, 2069–2096.
[17] Chernick, H. (2000) Federal grants and social welfare spending: do state responses matter. National Tax Journal, 53, 143–152.
[18] Bird, R.M. and Wallich, C. (1993) Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Relations in Transition Economies. World Bank Working Paper WPS1122.
Dr. Ludovick Leon Shirima (2021), Ethiopia: Ugly Mathematical Unit Cost Fiscal Equalization Formula; Beautiful Findings . IJBMR 9(1), 55-64. DOI: 10.37391/IJBMR.090109.